There are many famous quotes that talk about the inevitability of change.
They all say, “change is inevitable” and I agree.
After all, in this fast-paced world, things are constantly developing, constant changes in technology means we are always having to adjust to keep pace with a rapidly evolving world.
Those who can adapt are often more likely to succeed while those who can’t often get left behind.
In my own field, the advent of social media and the tools that assist with easy dissemination of information have meant a change in attitude and approach to how content is created for traditional media.
But in my field and many others, there are people who constantly resist change for whatever reason.
I must admit, change isn’t always good and so it can sometimes be difficult to determine when change is necessary as opposed to when to maintain the status quo.
In sports, many athletes are faced with this dilemma. As a teenager, which sport should I focus on? I think I could be world-class at a couple and then at the highest level what’s my best position or what is my best event? Those are questions many athletes constantly ask themselves.
The answers are never easy to find and that is exactly why when an athlete makes drastic career alterations and still finds more success they should be lauded.
I think about former Jamaican hurdler Danny McFarlane, the 2004 Olympic 400 metre hurdles silver medallist.
Before Danny was a hurdler, he was a more than competent flat 400 metres athlete.
By the time he ran his first ever race over 400m hurdles, in April of 2003, Danny was already an Olympic 400 metres finalist, an Olympic mile relay silver medallist, four times an IAAF World Championship mile relay silver medallist, an IAAF World Indoor mile relay champion and also 400 metres bronze medallist.
To say he had carved out a solid career is an understatement.
But clearly Danny felt he could have achieved more from the sport of track and field. However, his personal best at 400 metres was 44.90 seconds, set in 1995.
If he wasn’t going to run much faster, which was unlikely at 31 years old when he changed events, then it’s unlikely he would have done much more than appear on a few Jamaican relay teams.
So, he took the bold step despite little to no hurdling experience.
I won’t chart the race by race improvements he made between April 2003 and his Olympic silver medal performance at the Athens Games in 2004 but I will say his rise was meteoric.
In his first year of contesting the event, he won the Jamaican title, improved to 48.30 seconds, and finished fourth at the World Championships in Paris France.
And so, it wasn’t a massive surprise that he was a contender when the Olympic Games rolled around in 2004.
With eventual champion Felix Sanchez of the Dominican Republic and American James Carter favored to battle for Gold, many felt McFarlane was running for bronze.
But the 32-year-old timed it perfectly, running a personal best 48.00 seconds to win his semi-final and when Carter blew up down the stretch in the final, McFarlane pounced and captured a deserved silver.
My recollection of Caribbean voice Lance Whittaker, “and McFarlane looks as if he will get silver – and he does,” as his voice raised almost in shock.
One thing we all remember from that Danny McFarlane performance is that it was far from perfect.
His 400 metre hurdles journey from 2003 to the point of his retirement as a 40-year-old in 2012 was characterized by less than perfect hurdling.
While he improved over time, for the most part, his hurdling could be described as jumping.
But he jumped his way into the hearts of Jamaicans who adored him because of his willingness to try something new, to embrace change, to fight, and when technique failed to turn to heart.
For all that and more, Danny McFarlane isn’t just a lesson for 2004 but a lesson for life.
Danny isn’t just a lesson for track and field or just for sport but a lesson for all endeavors. Danny, we salute you and say thank you for teaching us all a valuable lesson.